July sale - up to 30% off training courses – use code: JULY26AUS
26 August 2025
The skills gap isnāt a new phenomenon, but itās widening. As technology evolves and workforce expectations shift, many organisations are grappling with a familiar dilemma: do we train the people we ha...
The skills gap isnāt a new phenomenon, but itās widening. As technology evolves and workforce expectations shift, many organisations are grappling with a familiar dilemma: do we train the people we have, or hire new talent to fill the gap?
On one side is the promise of speed and expertise through recruitment. On the other, the sustainability and loyalty that come with investing in existing employees. While both approaches offer benefits, neither is a silver bullet, and choosing the right path starts with understanding when each is most effective.
Upskilling, along with cross-skilling and reskilling, allow organisations to grow capability from within. Itās an investment not just in skills, but in people. Internal development fosters retention, protects institutional knowledge, and supports a culture of continuous improvement.
For example, when organisations implement new technologies, internal teams are often well positioned to adopt them, provided theyāre given the right training and support. Similarly, when strong performers step into leadership roles, targeted development can ease the transition and reduce early missteps.
Upskilling is also a powerful way to address future needs. By identifying high-potential employees and equipping them with new capabilities, organisations can create a more flexible, resilient workforce: one thatās ready to take on changing demands without relying solely on external hires.
There are times when building from within isnāt practical. New service areas, urgent delivery timelines, or highly specialised expertise may require external recruitment, especially when no internal equivalent exists.
In fast-moving sectors like technology or regulated industries, hiring someone with direct experience can significantly reduce ramp-up time. External hires can also introduce fresh thinking and challenge internal norms, helping to accelerate innovation or reset underperforming teams.
However, recruitment comes with its own challenges. Itās typically more expensive, with additional costs beyond salary, including recruitment fees, onboarding, and a longer adjustment period. Thereās also cultural risk: external hires must integrate into existing teams, processes and values, which doesnāt always go smoothly.
Thereās no one-size-fits-all answer and sometimes the best strategy is to combine both methods. But leaders can make clearer decisions by considering three core questions:
In stable environments with time to plan, upskilling is often the better route. It strengthens the organisation from within and builds long-term capacity. But when the business is entering new territory, or when the cost of delay is high, hiring may be the faster ā and necessary ā solution.
Many organisations are now adopting a hybrid approach, combining internal development with targeted external recruitment. This allows them to maximise the return on investment (ROI) of learning and development while still filling strategic gaps with outside talent.
A successful blend might involve using internal data to map future capability needs, aligning L&D with business strategy, and reserving recruitment for high-impact roles where internal upskilling isnāt realistic. The result is a more deliberate, flexible response to skills shortages as well as a more resilient workforce overall.
Ultimately, addressing the skills gap isnāt just a choice between upskilling and hiring. Itās a question of when to build and when to buy, and how to do both in a way that supports business goals, employee engagement and sustainable growth.
Looking to close capability gaps with confidence? ILX offers practical, targeted development programmes to upskill, reskill and cross-skill your workforce, helping you build long-term value while navigating todayās talent challenges.